How do the Sola Scrptura folks react to the Dead Sea Scrolls and other more recent discoveries of ancient Biblical texts not among those canonized by Martin Luther?
12.06.2025 02:54
Even Jesus questioned how the Messiah was David's son.
If you study, you will find passages in the Orthodox Bible, not in the Catholic.
The influence of the Christian Old Testament was the Septuagint, which predates Jesus. Luther, also maintained the Septuagint philosophy of law, history, poetry and prophets, in ordering, while the Tanakh followed Torah, prophets (Nevi'im) and writings (Ketuvim).
FDA rolls out AI tool agency-wide, weeks ahead of schedule - statnews.com
Since the Bible is a collection of writings (literally what biblia means), you will even find that while Matthew and Luke have genealogies, Paul wrote to Titus and Timothy not to pursue foolish genealogies.
In response to A2A:
The New Testament was established as part of creating a universal (catholic) interpretation for all Christians.
How an unnoticed pregnancy complication almost ended a young Staten Island mom’s life - SILive.com
Actually, Luther was influenced by the books of the Masoretic Tanakh and did, originally, include the Apocrypha.
However, if one is using the Bible as a premise and traditions, how does one evaluate discrepancies between the two, as traditions are interpretations of Bible passages as their claim for validation.
Nuda Scriptira is scripture alone. Sola Scriptura is writings authority over traditions and does not imply Biblical inerrancy (see above in regards to Jesus, and genealogy to David).
Fallout 76: Gone Fission Release Notes - Bethesda.net
Just as there are a few discrepancies between the Masoretic and Samaritan Torahs.